Do you know about - Senator Rick Insanetorum
Live Stock Quotes Google! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.Rick Santorum has ultimately written and published his obligatory pre-presidential campaign book entitled, "It Takes A Family: Conservatism and the coarse Good". The title is a very clever play on the book by the anti-Christ, Hillary Clinton, called, "It Takes A Village". Personally, I think he got it all wrong and probably should have entitled it, "It Takes a hamlet Idiot: Neo-Conservatism and The Uncommon Bad". The quotes from Senator Santorum's book are already flowing through the media feeding tube and into the mouths of the spin starved political pundits. I have not read the book nor do I intend to (I haven't read the anti-Christ's either) but the early returns are already in and Mr. Santorum has not let anyone down. Oh, he talks about mothers (not husbands for some traditional reason) staying home with the kids and foregoing careers. He talks about the sanctity of marriage and traditional family; you know, the usual stuff. It's all going to be fodder someday for a lot of good fun when he makes his bid to rerun for his Senate seat in 2006 and finally for a presidential bid in 2008.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the true about Live Stock Quotes Google. You check this out article for info on a person want to know is Live Stock Quotes Google.How is Senator Rick Insanetorum
Unfortunately, when I heard the notification of the book release, which included some of his most insightful written pearls to date, everything came flooding back to me like a septic tank backing up and slurping out from under the toilet seat lid. I had understanding wrongly that I was over him. To put it plainly, he scares me poopless. This is the story of how I got to this lowly place.
During the summer of 2004, I had ample time to watch a boatload of Senate hearings on C-Span while I was honing my writing skills--something that unfortunately requires endless honing. I can say with certainty that I have never been more viscerally affected by the antics and words of one someone than I was when I stumbled upon the Senator from Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum. I mean, I had "heard about him" but never unquestionably "heard him". Up until then, neo-con propagandist Sean Hannity, faith healer Benny Hinn and memory/natural cure expert/telemarketer Kevin Trudeau were in a three way race for my top disdained fellow Americans. But quite honestly, they were and are containable, and in the end, rather trite and irrelevant--much like my life.
However, when I heard Senator Santorum (i.e., as in United States Senator Santorum) rant on about the significance of putting forth a Constitutional Marriage Amendment to safe the sanctity of the traditional family, I just about fell out of my artificial leather La-Z-Boy Bronson recliner. My head began spinning when he started out with that wild eye impassioned plea:
"Marriage is hate. Marriage is a stain. Marriage is an evil thing. That's what we hear. Habitancy who stand for traditional marriage are haters, they're bashers, they're mean-spirited, they're intolerant. ... Well, we're not!"
Oh now come on there Ricky boy, wouldn't you say you're just a tad intolerant (and a bit dramatic I might add). I'll give you that you're not a hater or a basher or mean-spirited and believe me I'm overlooking a lot, but you're kidding when you say you are not intolerant.
Then he terminated in a very sad, practically tearful summary by uttering:
"Isn't that the extreme homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?"
Oh boy, that's a gem. So let me get this right, if we make it illegal for "traditional" married couples to disjunction (I mean come on Ricko, let's unquestionably defend it buddy), and at the same time, split up all those two parent families who happen to be same sex (you know what perversion I'm talking about), somehow that will ultimately supply homeland security. Look, the Rick Meister has floated a lot of nutty ideas that I have disagreed with but I have always tried to understand his intent and respect his right to spew chunks. Having said all that, this attempt to tie traditional marriage to homeland safety is insane, development him the guy that just might be the next darling of Karl Rove and the neo-cons for that 2008 Presidential ticket. Holy mackerels fat boy!
Here's what I think about the premise. That logic (i.e., the significance of "traditional" marriage, family, etc; you know, the same stuff O'Reilly spits out) was the exact same logic used to prevent passage of the 19th Amendment (the right for women to vote). I think it can be argued (cunningly I must say) that Frist, Santorum and the rest of the Lott would have vehemently denounced the passage of that amendment, given the circumstances and traditions of that era. They would have had no other selection because women's suffrage meant change, and change starts with "C" and that rhymes with "P" and that means "Please no change. Please, oh please, oh please no change". Look, before you get all nuts, I love traditions, like our family tradition to open stocking gifts before presents on Christmas morning. But I'm talking about small potatoes here, about family traditions that have puny impact on others. And they are nice to have. They can be comforting in times of great angst. But Rickie Ricardo is talking about big stuff.
You know, it wasn't all that long ago that traditional marriage was defined to be among birds of a feather (that's code for same race). I can hear him in a nightmare--the Rickster development an impassioned plea on the Senate floor in the early Sixties with regard to an amendment to the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman of the same color.
"You don't want to mix up those colors at the pulpit. No way! Could cause a clash, a color clash, a clash of the pigments. Gotta keep those colors the same. It's tradition. Why it's more than tradition! It's traditional family values! everybody knows that children are best raised by parents whose colors match. Do you mix coloreds with whites in the laundry? Of procedure you don't!" (just a note to my neo-con friends who might be loading their attack weapons right about now: he unquestionably didn't say that. It's what they call ... Um ... Satirical license.)
It was shortly after his dramatic speech on the floor of the Senate that I fondly nicknamed him, Rick Insanetorum.
But I was not totally satisfied. It was all too easy. Maybe he was just having a bad month. It happens. No, I needed more meat on the bones to substantiate my theory that he was mentally incapacitated. Alas, after an exhaustive and crazed duration of "googling" to find other quotes, I uncovered a carbuncle of classics, ready for the lancing. And by far, the following sealed the deal:
"I have no qoute with homosexuality. I have a qoute with homosexual acts."
Let's see, I suppose a natural corollary to that would be something like, "I have no qoute with African Americans. I have a qoute with the way African Americans behave." Or, "I have no qoute with Jewish folk. I have a qoute with Jewish folk practicing the Jewish faith with those puny beanies already."
What The Hell Is He Talking About!
How about this one with regard to the sodomy laws in Texas that were overturned by a consummate Court vote of 6-3:
"The idea (i.e. Of the ruling) is that the State doesn't have possession to limit individuals' wants and passions."
Well that is a bit of a stretch Ricky. Of procedure by using idea-ology words like "wants" and "passions", Insanetorum is construction his case for dark forbidden gay sex and all its cousins: pedophilia, incest, bestiality and watermelonialia (look it up; come to think of it, if you do look it up, please stop reading). He extracted "the idea" from the court's majority ruling in which Justice Anthony Kennedy eloquently wrote: "The petitioners are entitled to respect for their inexpressive lives. The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by development their inexpressive sexual guide a crime." The language is referring to two consenting adults having sex. I don't see "wants" and "passions" in there at all. And by the way, this ruling, although specifically written from a case thoughprovoking two gay men, reached beyond that to heterosexuals by wiping sodomy laws off the books in other states: Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri prohibited oral and anal sex between same-sex couples; Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia prohibit consensual sodomy for everyone.
Insanetorum, having set the trap by "spinning" the ruling, continued on:
"I disagree with that (i.e., with the idea). I think we (i.e., States) unquestionably have possession because there are consequences to letting Habitancy live out anyone wants or passions they desire."
I know that puny mind of his was working overtime. He's got something cookin' in that iron clad skillet of a skull of his. I just can not frame out what. Let's read that last part real slowly.
"... Because there are consequences to letting Habitancy live out anyone wants or passions they desire."
Hm... What is that wily wascal up to. Well maybe he is on to something. Let's see. Like if your passion is food, you probably will get fat and strain the Healthcare System. Like if your want is sleep, you might come to be a lazy bastard and inflate the unemployment numbers. Like if your desire is oral sex, there will be no babies, no legacy, no continuation of this great nation.
What The Hell Is He Talking About!
I only know that I want to be able to tour freely about my country without fear that I might accidentally stay overnight in some state that has carefully that my proclivity for a determined type of sex with my willing adult partner is in violation of its "passion laws". Forget homosexuals for the moment. Nine of those states had "want and passion" laws against everyone--that's what I'm talking about. I don't need the aggravation; besides, think of the energy we'll conserve by not having to drive around those states.
I was temporarily living in Richard's fine state of Pennsylvania, when this Insanetorum revelation occurred. I was consumed with it, when I happened on a Democratic Fund Raiser at a local microbrew restaurant in early October 2004, right before the Presidential Elections. They had speakers and hoopla and the usual stuff; you know, to fire up the base. I didn't pay much attentiveness as I sat at the bar eating a goat cheese, sun dried tomato pizza, chasing it down with a cold foamy amber Bengal Ipa, and in general, minding my own firm as I worked over some ideas that finally became this website.
During a break in the extravaganza, a woman came over to the bar to order a chardonnay, as did seventy two others. After accidentally nudging me while reaching over my shoulder to grab her glass, she apologized and began a conversation, during which she explained to me what was going on and her tremendous role in the event. She seemed like a nice person--you know, involved. When she terminated talking, being a new Pennsylvanian and not knowledgeable in the state's politics, I asked her a examine that had been nagging me ever since the modern Insanetorum revelation. The conversation went sort of like this:
Me: "How in the world did Pennsylvania elect Santorum?"
She: "I'm sorry? Who?" (to her credit it was noisy)
Me: "You know, Rick Santorum; Senator Rick Santorum?"
She: "Gee, I don't unquestionably know. I'll have to get back to you on that. Do you have an email address?"
Me: "That's okay. Just do me a favor and make sure it doesn't happen again. Please!"
She just blankly stared at me as I terminated up and bolted out the door before she could say "campaign contribution". The sad truth is he did get elected and Pennsylvanians seem to be scratching their collective heads wondering how. Well don't let it happen again! I don't want to see that numbskull in any place near the Senate construction in 2007. As I said in the beginning, he scares me poopless.
And with that I leave you with this one last priceless piece of Insanetorum wisdom:
"Thirty-two years after the legalization of abortion by the consummate Court decision Roe v. Wade, the majority of Americans consider themselves pro-life."
What The Hell Is He Talking About!
I hope you will get new knowledge about Live Stock Quotes Google. Where you'll be able to put to used in your day-to-day life. And above all, your reaction is Live Stock Quotes Google.Read more.. Senator Rick Insanetorum. View Related articles related to Live Stock Quotes Google. I Roll below. I have counseled my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Senator Rick Insanetorum.
No comments:
Post a Comment